At The Tipping Point: How To Save Us From Self Destruction

 Social & Environmental Justice  No Responses »
Nov 192016
 

tipping_thumbBook page

Collectively we are engaging in self-destructive behavior, compromising our present and jeopardizing our future. Rampant greed, irregular regulation, unrestrained urban and resource development, out of control global warming, biased pharmaceutical and biotechnology research, and lethal levels of obesity, are all severely damaging us. Dr. Bowins drills down exposing these forms of self-destruction, and shows why we might be setting ourselves up for widespread revolution and devastation. Also revealed is how our psychological defenses ironically perpetuate major forms of self-destructive behavior. We have reached the tipping point, but the solutions proposed can save us from self-destruction, if we each take action.

pdf-icon1 Too Hot To Handle: Global Warming sample-chapter

 

 

ERA OF UNENLIGHTENMENT

 Social & Environmental Justice  No Responses »
Jan 052025
 

Have you found yourself wondering why the unreal suddenly seems to be the new real? Conspiracy theory themes are viewed by many as the gospel, and the truth matters not a bit. “Leaders” justify their apparently irrational choices any way they can, and the rhetoric is widely accepted. The seemingly dwindling segment of the population that places truth and doing the right thing front and center, is increasing living with shock and dismay. Welcome to the Era of Unenlightenment!

Despite the vast amount of information readily available via the Internet, which theoretically should support enlightenment, we are moving in the opposite direction. This conundrum appears to arise from three mutually reinforcing pillars:

Pillar number one: suspension of critical thinking. Evaluating information in a questioning fashion, with analysis, and informed interpretation, greatly assists in distinguishing the real from the unreal. For critical thinking to transpire people must be willing to acquire information from more than one, perhaps several, credible sources, and then weigh the merits of the different perspectives. With the rise of social media, many people appear to struggle with more than one very abbreviated source of information. Once you stop reading (or never started), critical thinking is near impossible. For example, vaccines cause autism and other diseases. The autism perspective was based on one study that has since been discredited, the reasons why requiring some reading. Instead, many people have accepted it as the truth, and social media feeds from unreliable sources made to appear credible, bolster the unenlightened perspective. Once a person starts looking at these brief social media feeds, others reinforcing the distorted perspective are presented based on how social media algorithms work. No critical thinking transpires throughout this process, ensuring an erroneous conclusion.

Pillar number two: cognitive distortions. A significant portion of my research has focused on psychological defense mechanisms, and in the peer-reviewed article, Psychological Defense Mechanisms: A New Perspective, I proposed that our two major defense mechanism templates consist of positive cognitive distortions and dissociation. Regarding the former, good mental health is characterized by self-supporting spins, such as, “I did not do well on that test because the teacher asked questions on topics that were not to be included.” Mental illnesses, namely depression and anxiety, are characterized by negative cognitive distortions, such as, “I did not do well on that test, because I just don’t have the intelligence to cut it.” People commonly distort things in a way that is easier for them to process mentally; it is all about the spin as advertisers know very well. If critical thinking is engaged and robust knowledge acquired, then more complex perspectives are comfortable, but what happens when critical thinking is suspended? Overly simple spins then become the easiest choice. Science, as in its purest form of the pursuit of true outcomes, is highly relevant. From what I have observed the general level of scientific knowledge is incredibly low, possibly abysmal, not surprising when significant reading is required to understand the nature of things. Additionally, the orientation to pursuing true outcomes is painfully low, even for many who work in areas where critical thinking is important. Take my own area of mental health, where discrete conditions such as major depression and minor depression are the norm, when evidence supporting this discreteness is very weak and evidence supporting mental health conditions being on continuums, such as from low to high depression, is very robust. Many professionals and researchers in mental health disciplines digest the discrete condition perspective hook, line, and sinker, and are not interested in absorbing even peer-reviewed articles showing why the discrete perspective is false. In the absence of critical thinking and the research necessary to become fully informed, the spin, “Since the powers that be as in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders maintain that there are discrete conditions, that is what must be.” Sad, but apparently true. Discrete entities are easier to process mentally and proponents distort reality to see what is most comfortable. In the widespread scenario of virtually no science knowledge, and certainly no adherence to the pursuit of true outcomes, spins like, “Covid is not real,” “Vaccines kill and are just for drug company profits,” Vaccines cause autism,” “Global warming is not caused by human activity,” are ironically more comfortable as they are understandable, and certainly compared to the science of newer vaccines and viruses, and global warming. Interestingly, the degree of cognitive distortion inherent in many conspiracy type beliefs is to the high end of the spectrum, abutting and even overlapping with psychotic thought content!

Pillar number three: Greed. People are naturally somewhat more focused on their own welfare, than that of others, and resource acquisition is part of this evolutionary-derived process. However, the emphasis on wealth accumulation seems to be off the Richter Scale. It brings to mind the Gordon Gekko character in the first Wall Street movie, his greedy actions shocking the other characters and audiences. Then in the sequel no one is shocked, and he comments that everyone is drinking from the same (greed) well. Interactions between the three pillars of unenlightenment play a role in this rampant greed, as we noted for suspension of critical thinking and cognitive distortions: when a person is so focused on wealth acquisition, critical thinking often has to be suspended and supportive cognitive distortions ramped up. For example, “My having billions of dollars does not short-change the poorer segment of the population,” and “I deserve this money given what I have achieved, and it almost certainly trickles down to the poor!” Ideal cognitive distortions for sleeping well at night, and not doing the right thing. Even the population at large oddly enough seems to support this wealth entitlement, suspending critical thinking about offshore tax havens and the shadow economy (which is actually clear and not in the shadows), that maintains the inequity. People even spin it in positive ways, such as “America is the land of opportunity, and I might one day have many houses, cars, and yachts!” Not likely, as it takes money to make money.

Enlightenment, in terms of having knowledge and understanding, must be front and center of positive progress for all, and the true pursuit of true outcomes. Unfortunately, there is not much hope for such an outcome in this era of unenlightenment, and yes, this is a negative cognitive distortion, and one that many of those who care are feeling. For my part, I will continue to pursue true outcomes in my research and broader perspectives, engage critical thinking, and resist cognitive distortions that reinforce greed and the era of unenlightenment. I encourage you to do the same.

GUNS AND THE UNITED STATES: THE POWER OF NARRATIVES

 Social & Environmental Justice  No Responses »
Jan 302023
 

Acts of gun violence are a regular occurrence in the United States, prompting repeated calls for gun control of various forms. Unfortunately, these calls for legal reform fail, an occurrence as consistent as the gun violence that prompted the calls for reform. Perhaps it is time that the entire scenario be questioned, as there might be a better way to address this entrenched problem.

That better way is narratives! At an individual level we all have stories about our own life, some more central and others more minor. For instance, a person might view their athletic ability as a central self-narrative. In a similar fashion, nations have narratives that help to define them. In the United States arguably the most powerful narrative is, THE GUN. The west was won by the gun, and the cowboy-gun narrative is potent. Freedom and democracy represent another prominent narrative, although, maybe less robust than THE GUN, because democracy and freedom were largely won by the gun, as in World War II.

Of crucial significance, narratives are fiction and not reality, although they are treated like the real thing. For example, a cowboy and his gun—what could be more accurate? As it turns out, cowboys in the past and the few remaining in the present, can live just fine without a gun, but need a rope. For the true cowboy a rope is more important, but the storyline, “The west was won by the rope” does not really resonate well, even though it is more accurate. Given the power of prominent fictional narratives like THE GUN, trying to advance gun control is likely as effective as bringing a pellet gun to a tank battle. Might the power of narratives provide a way to make a real change in gun violence?

The key strategy that needs to be employed is to first change the prominent narrative to create fertile ground for legal changes. Take England where a prominent narrative is the monarchy and its role over centuries. If for some reason the monarchy was dangerous, trying to legislate its removal would be impossible given the power of the Royal Family narrative. Instead, this narrative would have to be diluted and weakened, such as by showing that the monarchy was not so important to England and maybe even detrimental. Then with the power of the Royal Family national narrative greatly diminished, legislating the abolition of it might be feasible. Likewise, if media, documentary and other filmmakers, writers, and leading figures, strongly questioned THE GUN narrative in the United States to dilute and weaken the power, then and only then, might legislative changes favoring gun control have a chance!

COWARDICE, SELF-INTEREST, AND STUPIDITY: HOW NOT TO LEAD

 Social & Environmental Justice  No Responses »
Mar 282022
 

A month into the disgusting attack by Putin and the Russian military against Ukraine, I write this post not in response to Putin, but in reaction to leaders of the west, NATO, and the United Nations. The bravery and resolve of the President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and the people of that country, in fighting a force ten times larger in terms of troops and weaponry is highly inspirational. Russian forces have been halted in some instances, stalled in most, and even pushed back, despite Ukraine forces being sadly deficient in weapons of offense. They need these weapons to survive and win, and without them are being pummeled by missile strikes, with citizens bearing much of the suffering. In stark contrast to the very inspirational performance of President Zelenskyy and Ukraine forces, is that of western leaders, NATO, and the United Nations, characterized by cowardice, self-interest, and stupidity, not necessarily in that order. They appear terrified of Putin, and what he might do despite the Russian leader being very calculating, and hence, extremely unlikely to apply long-range nuclear missiles, assuming Russia itself is not attacked. Self-interest is demonstrated by several European leaders wanting to ensure that the flow of Russian oil and natural gas continues, and how turning off the taps might impair their re-election hopes; they appear to be assuming that their citizens are as self-interested as they are, when support for Ukraine is extremely high in almost every country.

Then we come to stupidity, a nasty word but one that I strongly believe applies. It has been said that the only thing we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history, and to not learn the key lessons of World War II is frankly stupid, and certainly when applied to world leaders! When Hitler began his campaign of aggression the reaction of the west was generally appeasement, allowing Hitler to grow in confidence and capacity. An early aggressive intervention by the west would likely have ended his ambitions and prevented WWII in Europe. Much like Hitler, dictators like Putin undoubtedly interpret the stance of western leaders as weakness, and they are accurate in that perspective. Putin has expressed how Ukraine is an impediment to his ambitions for Eastern Europe. If Putin and the Russian forces succeed in taking Ukraine, incursions into eastern European countries are inevitable, at least once the Russian army has a chance to rebuild and learn from their mistakes. Then we will have WWIII in all likelihood! It is stupid not to learn from the lessons of history. The rhetoric of “not an inch of NATO soil is to be taken by Russia” is hollow, as if they failed to help Ukraine with weapons of offense, let alone do the ultimate right thing and send troops in to push the Russians into the Crimean Sea, then it is unlikely that they will not try and appease Putin when these incursions start. Giving up on the fight for freedom and democracy against control and autocracy once, means it will likely repeat. Perhaps these western leaders should consider the bravery of Franklin D. Roosevelt during WWII, who despite warnings from his advisors that England was expected to collapse in 6 months, and how Hitler will be upset about the United States delivering weapons, he ignored them and sent all the weapons available. The actions of Winston Churchill, and how his words and behavior guided and inspired the nation, likewise need to be pondered. Following in their footsteps, with his own flair, is Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who has acted as a true leader, standing strong and rallying his people and forces to fight the Russian aggressors. If I was a politician, I would want to be remembered as being like one of these three inspirational leaders, and not my performance being characterized by cowardice, self-interested, and stupidity!

GLOBAL WARMING—THAT PERSISTENT PROBLEM

 Social & Environmental Justice  No Responses »
Feb 102017
 

Warming of the planet from carbon dioxide (CO2) and other so-called greenhouse gases is a problem in contrast to what some still believe, and a problem that will not go away. Much like alcoholism it persists despite denials of its existence. The problem arises from our burning of fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and gas. Generally speaking, there are three ways of dealing with the problem: First, prepare as best we can for a globally warmed world, second, switch to greener sources of energy, and third, sequester carbon from the atmosphere. In, At The Tipping Point: How to Save Us From Self-Destruction, I cover each of these options in detail. Even ten years ago few spoke openly about relying on the first option, but more and more I hear politicians stating this very option. However, it is very sad when it comes down to just allowing a fully globally warmed world to occur with all the associated costs. Given our technical capabilities, which largely created this problem in the first place, we should be able to solve the problem. Of course, part of the solution involves checking our endless growth economic model with the associated hyper-consumerism, something few seem open to. The second option, switching to greener sources of energy frequently falter because they often run counter to the endless growth economic model. In addition, our energy needs are so great that it will be very difficult, if not impossible, to supply all that we need from green energy.

 

The best option we have is to sequester carbon from the atmosphere, with one possibility consisting of machines that can do this. Unfortunately, when the carbon costs of producing all the associated piping to transfer the carbon underground are considered, this option loses its lustre. However, there is a way that actually has numerous spin-off benefits and will help return the planet to a more natural state: Converting our major annual seed crops to perennials. Annual plants only last a year with their roots dying off, whereas perennials last more than a year, the roots remaining alive. Annual seed crops include wheat, corn, rice, soybean, sunflower, oat, barley, chickpea, common bean, peanut, pearl millet, rape, and sorghum. Perennial fruits include apple, apricot, avocado, banana, blackcurrant, grape, kiwi, pear, pineapple, plum, strawberry, and raspberries. Perennial vegetables include eggplant, broccoli, asparagus, leek, potato, rhubarb, spinach, taro, sweet potato, and watercress. Perennial herbs consist of alfalfa, basil, dill, garlic, ginger, horseradish, lavender, mint, onions, oregano, sage, and thyme. We are then very familiar with perennial crops, and of course there are trees that are perennial.

 

When it comes to annual plants there are several problems. First, because the plant dies off each year they are net releasers of carbon to the atmosphere. Second, given their limited root structure they are very poor at retaining water, and with dwindling fresh water supplies this is a major issue. Third, due to how weak they are we have to add nutrients such as nitrogen that commonly run off with fresh water polluting waterways. Global data for corn, rice, and wheat annual crops indicate that only 18-49% of nitrogen applied as fertilizer is taken up by crops while the rest is lost. Herbicides and pesticides also have to be liberally applied with health costs.

 

Perennials, on the other hand, with their extensive root system are great absorbers of carbon from the atmosphere. The soil carbon sink is the fastest carbon sink, and the only one that can really help get global warming under control quickly. The oceans absorb a great deal of carbon but it is a slow process that is currently destroying coral reefs due to acidification. Rocks can absorb a massive amount of carbon but this process occurs over thousands of years. In addition to the carbon sequestration value of perennials there is water retention: The roots of perennials hold water and release it when needed, thereby minimizing irrigation needs. In addition, perennials retain nutrients eliminating or greatly reducing fertilizer use. Via artificial selection, hybridization, and utilization of genome knowledge, all of our major annual crops can be converted to perennials. Ten of our thirteen most common annual seed crops, such as wheat and rice, have natural perennial relatives, an occurrence that will greatly assist in the conversion. The United Kingdom’s Biotechnology and Biological Services Council has calculated that if we replaced only 2% of annual crops with perennials, we could remove enough carbon from the atmosphere to halt the increase in atmospheric CO2! If we were to replace all farmland with perennials we would sequester about 118 parts per million of CO2, enough to return the world to preindustrial levels! Another option is to replace our agricultural lands and cities with trees, but I doubt that this option will be accepted.

 

So why is replacing our major annual seed crops with perennials, an incredible option, rarely discussed, and why is funding so limited for it? Very good questions. Part of the answer might have to do with the annual seed agriculture industry. Annual seeds have to be planted each year, then there is all that fertilizer, herbicides, pesticides, not to mention expensive irrigation equipment. Perennial agriculture might well seem like a threat to profits, and in our endless economic growth system it’s mostly about products and profits. Instead of making the conversion, which scientists estimate could occur in even twenty years, let’s just prepare as best we can. Really?

 

For more information about converting our major annual seed crops to perennials read the free pdf of the Too Hot to Handle: Global Warming chapter, from my book, At The Tipping Point: How To Save Us From Self-Destruction, available on this blog site.